From: | Imre Samu <pella(dot)samu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres? |
Date: | 2019-09-30 09:40:31 |
Message-ID: | CAJnEWw=aPmFnbp5Phev=p=91JcdN3MV6Ry+CO_MY+bQKLuBWqA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
from the original article:
> For example, the PostgreSQL speeds depend on the Django ORM code
> that makes the SQL and sends the query and then turns it into the model
instance.
> I don't know what the proportions are between that and
> the actual bytes-from-PG's-disk times. But I'm not sure I care either.
imho: the "Django ORM" is not so fast.
according to "TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks" ...
it has only ~3% performance - compare to the best rust+pg (100%) results.
example:
"Data updates"
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r18&hw=ph&test=update
the "django-postgresql" performance = 766 - only 3.0% of the best pg +
rust results
checking the other test types ( "Single query" ;" Multiple queries" ) has
a similar results.
the Django implementation of the test:
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Python/django
Imre
Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 29.,
V, 23:42):
> Hi,
>
> Can someone take a look at this blog post?
> https://www.peterbe.com/plog/redis-vs-postgres-blob-of-json
>
> Can Redis really be 16 times faster than Postgres? Surely Postgres can get
> closer to the raw speed of the hardware than 1 order of magnitude?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2019-09-30 11:20:03 | Re: pg12 rc1 on CentOS8 depend python2 |
Previous Message | Gerrit Fouche | 2019-09-30 09:15:47 | pg_upgrade (Checking for reg* data types) |