From: | info Spinbackup <info(at)spinbackup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Submitted Organization, follow up for Press release |
Date: | 2012-12-12 12:57:23 |
Message-ID: | CAJiOt0CWU_Oiw7UrrmYTK_6JzVWZSseiSA8kVhS3___n1qAg3Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Organizations ate really the easiest ones. Just look for completely
> obvious spam or incomplete submission. Approving an organization doesn't
> actually add anything to the site - it just makes it possible to add other
> thinks like news and events, which will then go through a second round of
> moderation.
>
> /Magnus
> On Dec 6, 2012 10:53 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> WWW:
>>
>> We need some policies for approving organizations. I stay away from
>> moderating them most of the time because I'm not sure how I'm supposed
>> to decide whom to approve.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Berkus
>> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>> http://pgexperts.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>>
>
I submitted the release 6 days ago. Is there a point at which I should
expect some type of feedback from a Moderator?
It's somewhat tied in with an article in progress at Yahoo + other.
Thanks,
Mike Ellsworth
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-12-17 13:33:38 | pgfoundry down again |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-12-11 17:40:38 | Fwd: Re: [PG-RCs] Admin password for arpug and bapug mailing lists |