Re: Submitted Organization, follow up for Press release

From: info Spinbackup <info(at)spinbackup(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Submitted Organization, follow up for Press release
Date: 2012-12-12 12:57:23
Message-ID: CAJiOt0CWU_Oiw7UrrmYTK_6JzVWZSseiSA8kVhS3___n1qAg3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> Organizations ate really the easiest ones. Just look for completely
> obvious spam or incomplete submission. Approving an organization doesn't
> actually add anything to the site - it just makes it possible to add other
> thinks like news and events, which will then go through a second round of
> moderation.
>
> /Magnus
> On Dec 6, 2012 10:53 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> WWW:
>>
>> We need some policies for approving organizations. I stay away from
>> moderating them most of the time because I'm not sure how I'm supposed
>> to decide whom to approve.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Berkus
>> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>> http://pgexperts.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>>
>

I submitted the release 6 days ago. Is there a point at which I should
expect some type of feedback from a Moderator?

It's somewhat tied in with an article in progress at Yahoo + other.

Thanks,
Mike Ellsworth

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-12-17 13:33:38 pgfoundry down again
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-12-11 17:40:38 Fwd: Re: [PG-RCs] Admin password for arpug and bapug mailing lists