| From: | Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Burgess, Freddie" <FBurgess(at)radiantblue(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql concern of effect of invalid index |
| Date: | 2014-08-24 15:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAJghg4JCpNr_ZQuZETjnXA+8TB6rPug7Qz1SOA4wcYb3G434sQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> > If you marked it as invalid, then it is not going to be updated
> > anymore.
>
> I think you are confusing indisvalid with indisready:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/catalog-pg-index.html
>
> Flagging it is invalid should suppress its use for queries, yet
> still do all the work of maintaining it.
You are right. Sorry about the noise.
Regards,
--
Matheus de Oliveira
Analista de Banco de Dados
Dextra Sistemas - MPS.Br nível F!
www.dextra.com.br/postgres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | dbhandary | 2014-08-25 22:50:29 | BUG #11264: Auto vacuum wraparound job blocking everything |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-08-24 11:45:39 | Re: Postgresql concern of effect of invalid index |