Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2021-11-16 23:39:00
Message-ID: CAJcOf-fg5ht+nRQsK6OJixQmByigHVwuNCcCUsHQmppaiSQbzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:33 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The second record can’t be replicated.
>
> By the way, when only applied 0001 patch, I couldn't reproduce this bug.
> So, I think it was related to the later patches.
>

The problem seems to be caused by the 0006 patch (when I remove that
patch, the problem doesn't occur).
Still needs investigation.

Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2021-11-16 23:55:26 Re: SQL:2011 application time
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-11-16 22:45:12 Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs