| From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |
| Date: | 2020-09-27 23:41:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAJcOf-fUWNUpt=fAC4ZCon9-6EDH4_1uFxRECsWGz2YD-CQb6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:03 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that we are not having any check for skipping temporary
> table insertion.
>
> You should also include temporary tables check here, as parallel
> workers might not have access to temporary tables.
>
Thanks Vignesh, you are right, I need to test this and add it to the
list of further exclusions that the patch needs to check for.
Hopefully I can provide an updated patch soon that caters for these
additional identified cases.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-27 23:58:55 | Re: Small improvements to pg_list.h's linitial(), lsecond(), lthird() etc macros |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-27 23:15:09 | Re: Partition prune with stable Expr |