| From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Date: | 2021-07-22 04:07:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAJcOf-eAHHSAWXPouLrv2EJ9zd39etPHRKVEa3Wu2OjtHEOuTQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:42 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Personally, the new name pg_publication_sch is not very easy to understand.
> (Maybe it's because I am not a native english speaker. If others feel ok,
> please ignore this comment)
>
I was actually thinking the same thing.
I prefer the full SCHEMA/schema, even for all the internal
variables/definitions which have been changed since the last patch
version.
I think Vignesh was trying to be consistent with pg_publication_rel
and pg_subscription_rel, but maybe "rel" is better understood to be an
abbreviation for "relation" than "sch" for "schema"?
Thoughts from others?
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-07-22 04:12:57 | Re: proposal: enhancing plpgsql debug API - returns text value of variable content |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-07-22 04:06:21 | window build doesn't apply PG_CPPFLAGS correctly |