From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix uninitialized variable access (src/backend/utils/mmgr/freepage.c) |
Date: | 2022-01-27 12:32:52 |
Message-ID: | CAJcOf-d7pRy7rJcb47HExUmPCqyuuwjps5Jt1uDRbL9H31hLiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 6:32 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:03:04PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > For me the assertion remains valid and usable.
>
> Well, I was looking at this thread again, and I still don't see what
> we benefit from this change. One thing that could also be done is to
> initialize "result" at {0} at the top of FreePageManagerGetInternal()
> and FreePageManagerPutInternal(), but that's in the same category as
> the other suggestions. I'll go drop the patch if there are no
> objections.
Why not, at least, just add "Assert(result.page != NULL);" after the
"Assert(!result.found);" in FreePageManagerPutInternal()?
The following code block in FreePageBtreeSearch() - which lacks those
initializations - should never be invoked in this case, and the added
Assert will make this more obvious.
if (btp == NULL)
{
result->page = NULL;
result->found = false;
return;
}
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-27 12:36:56 | Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | tushar | 2022-01-27 12:15:16 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |