From: | Kaveh Mousavi Zamani <kavehmz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Missing record in binary replica 9.3.0 |
Date: | 2013-10-17 13:13:43 |
Message-ID: | CAJcKpEp0SzTo_2PJ4T5s-yFw=ASzbQ+wXwjRN7h=vbc5u+TEyA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
All,
I found something in the following setup:
I have 3 DBS
db01 (9.3.0) master
db02 (9.3.0) replica same network
db03 (9.3.0) sync replica another network 80ms away.
db01 have around 30 - 300 records per second update.
At some point today I found there is a missing record in both replica.
Data after that point has been replicated though
db01
select * from transaction.account where client_detail_id ='163042';
id | client_detail_id | last_modified
---------+----------------+---------------+----------+
1736861 | 163042 | 2013-10-17 10:39:18.312815
in both other dbs no record.
Does anyone has any idea how could this happen?
then in db01 I did update last_modified field for that record and suddenly
new record and new last_modified values appeared in both replicas.
Regards
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-10-17 13:13:54 | Re: Index creation fails with automatic names |
Previous Message | Vick Khera | 2013-10-17 13:09:59 | Re: Index creation fails with automatic names |