Re: Best Strategy for Large Number of Images

From: Estevan Rech <softrech(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best Strategy for Large Number of Images
Date: 2021-12-15 20:12:10
Message-ID: CAJZXSXjYkdQbbG8Q=LCy29zmCfyfKjJO17djoV4fqbiSmQ7qeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adrian,

I have an application that takes pictures of items and uses them as
evidence in a report.

These images are saved and then used to generate a report.

Each item averages 10 photos and I have about 2 million photos currently,
with an average growth of 1 million photos over the next year.

I think about using it within the database because of the ease of selecting
records with the content of the images (when necessary).

I think my biggest concern is to continue to use this strategy for the next
2 years and encounter a PostgreSQL limitation or some failure and have to
migrate database again or have significant loss of images. And on the
contrary too, if I use it on disk and in 2 years I find some failure or
file limit in the operating system (currently it's windows server 2016)...

Related to this is the backup service that seems to me that in a disaster,
I can restore the database relatively quickly if it's in the database. On
the disk, I believe that the restoration is much slower and I don't think
it's reliable that all the images are copied/restored.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryn Llewellyn 2021-12-15 21:05:42 Re: Why can't I have a "language sql" anonymous block?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-12-15 19:37:19 Re: Best Strategy for Large Number of Images