From: | John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
Date: | 2019-01-07 20:56:59 |
Message-ID: | CAJVSVGXLtaB_u717e+C8Jq5T5VSo=vJ_Zfmy8PKn=35PFz-ztA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/3/19, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, that makes sense, John, can you provide a patch on top of the
> current patch where we check either the last block or every other
> block.
I've attached two patches for testing. Each one applies on top of the
current patch.
Mithun, I'll respond to your other review comments later this week.
-John Naylor
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fsm-last-page-only.patch | text/x-patch | 855 bytes |
fsm-every-other-page.patch | text/x-patch | 2.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2019-01-07 21:00:14 | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-01-07 19:34:08 | Re: ALTER INDEX fails on partitioned index |