Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

From: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Date: 2018-04-06 04:08:30
Message-ID: CAJVSVGVjomqEJdaoDswN9jEJPXibk_6KdkpJUsYxWZeMDa2FKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/6/18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Just had another thought about this business: if practical, we should
> remove the distinction between "descr" and "shdescr" and just use the
> former name in .dat files. genbki.pl knows which catalogs are shared,
> so it ought to be able to figure out where to route the descriptions.

Fairly trivial (attached), and shouldn't be too hard to integrate into
the series.

-John Naylor

Attachment Content-Type Size
unify-descr.patch text/x-patch 3.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-04-06 04:11:07 Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-04-06 03:46:34 Re: csv format for psql