Re: CoC [Final v2]

From: Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date: 2016-01-25 16:39:25
Message-ID: CAJTy2enwRM=VcuDvE0hXdZiDiJcbeuJTSa5TwLMEWO7SWkNT6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> Participation does not need to be limited to copy-editing. Of all the
>> ways to develop a community CoC, we're engaged in just about the worst
>> possible one right now.
>
> so what would be a better way of developing this ?

Of interesting note, the Ruby community is currently considering
switching to a CoC inspired directly from this draft of a Postgres
CoC. The extremely long conversation can be viewed at:

https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roxanne Reid-Bennett 2016-01-25 18:33:11 Re: A motion
Previous Message Tom Smith 2016-01-25 16:33:31 Re: TABLESAMPLE usage