| From: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, bristleconeweb(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: timestamp with time zone ~> GMT |
| Date: | 2025-02-07 15:50:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAJSLCQ1jRP5g=1zyttYeyS-Ui-0rGMCmUNrD1vmbJfCpxRXYAQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Hmm, I kind of like the up-front statement that timestamptz stores
> >> UTC. How about this simpler change?
>
> > I thought the re-order made sense since the preceding paragraph talks
> > exclusively about behavior, so this paragraph first contrasts the
> > behavioral difference between the two, and then mentions the storage
> > aspects as part of that story.
> > I actually like the above as well, but if it were me I'd move all
> > mentions of storage (the existing + the above) to the end of the
> > paragraph after the behavior aspects.
>
> OK, it makes more sense when considering the previous para as well.
> Here's a combined proposal that also adds glossary entries.
>
+1
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Miłosz Chmura | 2025-02-07 16:56:41 | Re: Minor suggestions for docs regarding json_table |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-02-07 10:43:58 | Regarding explanation to store and retrieve postgres geometric features |