| From: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | reid(dot)thompson(at)crunchydata(dot)com, Roberto Mello <roberto(dot)mello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [DOC] Add detail regarding resource consumption wrt max_connections |
| Date: | 2024-05-15 19:59:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAJSLCQ0gVGZRbZsWDJ5CnMH7v-7eZHR3d1xUiTz3s-5+Y9xQag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:14 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 1:57 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Rather, I think that it's entirely appropriate to do what Roberto
> > suggested, which is to say, let users know that they're going to use
> > some extra resources if they increase the setting, and then let them
> > figure out what if anything they want to do about that.
>
> Considering that, and the lack of further comment, I propose to commit
> the original patch.
>
> Objections?
>
I think the only unresolved question in my mind was if we should add a
similar note to the original patch to max_prepared_xacts as well; do
you intend to do that?
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-15 20:00:41 | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-15 19:52:42 | Re: add function argument names to regex* functions. |