From: | Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez <garcortez(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor and autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor |
Date: | 2021-01-07 16:56:33 |
Message-ID: | CAJP2v3Gg56td=O+GyAf7Vj758b=hkGMzUoGPw0kvZtExvxB_QA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for the information Laurenz Albe I have another question what will
be effect if there are autovacuums running all the time, what will be
settings you could suggest me for autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor and
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor
El mié, 6 ene 2021 a las 19:53, Laurenz Albe (<laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>)
escribió:
> On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 11:05 -0600, Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez wrote:
> > I have a question why settings default postgresql has
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor in 0.2
> > is higher than autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor 0.1, so If want to tune
> these parameters,
> > I always must leave autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor higher than
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor,
> > for instance I wanted to leave autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor in 0.002
> and
> > autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor in 0.001
>
> The autovacuum scale factor has been twice the autoanalyze scale factor
> since the
> beginning. You could search the archives from around 2004 for a reason,
> but I'd
> say it might have to do with the fact that ANALYZE is much cheaper than
> VACUUM,
> and that the impact of bad statistics is usually more severe than the
> impact of
> some dead tuples.
>
> But there is no need for you to keep it that way when you change the
> parameters.
> For example, if you want to speed up index only scans, you may want to set
> "autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor" to something like 0.01, but leave
> "autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor" at the default value.
>
> The values that you suggest seem much too low - that will result in
> autovacuum
> running all the time.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
>
--
Ing. Henry G. Cortez
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Watkins | 2021-01-07 21:35:40 | HA through Azure snapshots? |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2021-01-07 14:06:06 | Re: Showing materialized views |