Re: BUG #18433: Logical replication timeout

From: Kostiantyn Tomakh <tomahkvt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18433: Logical replication timeout
Date: 2024-05-02 06:56:13
Message-ID: CAJP09w7Um90OZWfk8WuJtvGDFto8asg0nayJW7rBaTd2icA0jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello, Bruce Momjian.
I know of course that Postgres 10 reached end of life on November 10, 2022.
I compared the behavior of Postgresql 10 and Postgresql 13 in the previous
email.
You can see this comparison below in the previous email.

In the previous email, I described the approach that we used for
transferring big tables between (2Tbytes). That approach worked for
Postgresql 10. But we had the problem with Postgresql 13 when used the
approach that was described in the previous email.
Just now I completed the test with source DB Postgresql 13 and destination
DB Postgresql 15.
The test was successful.
So we have the problem when source DB Postgresql 13 and destination DB
Postgresql 13.
The test and problem were described in the previous email.
Bruce Momjian, Could you help with this problem?

ср, 1 мая 2024 г. в 21:21, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:

> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 08:25:35PM +0300, Kostiantyn Tomakh wrote:
> > Hello, Shlok Kyal.
> >
> > I was able to reproduce the problem.
> > I did it on docker based platform I hope you will be able to reproduce
> this
> > problem too.
> > 1) I ran the docker-compose file with PostgreSQL 10:
> > docker-compose.yml:
>
> Postgres 10 was end-of-life on November 10, 2022:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>
> I suggest you reproduce on a supported version.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
> EDB https://enterprisedb.com
>
> Only you can decide what is important to you.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2024-05-02 11:57:05 BUG #18454: Reproducible SIGSEGV in query
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-05-02 04:00:00 Re: BUG #18449: Altering column type fails when an SQL routine depends on the column