From: | Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres UPGRADE from 9.2 to 9.4 |
Date: | 2016-09-06 23:28:28 |
Message-ID: | CAJNY3iv7svyyH-q7mkjaBmARpMYvUDU64DD25Z2Y3kdOZdxqhg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2016-09-07 11:25 GMT+12:00 John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>:
> On 9/6/2016 4:20 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
>
>> If you use slony to replicate, you CAN have 9.2 on the master and 9.4 on
>> the slave.
>>
>
> does rackspace support slony? how about amazon dms ?
>
> slony requires configuring replication on each table. if the database has
> a large complex schema this could take considerable setup effort.
> <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general>
>
I'm not using slony.... I'm using the default streaming replication
postgres 9.2 tool.
I'm setting up a postgres 9.2 master and a 9.4 streaming replication slave
atm...
will dump the DB on the 9.2 and restore it into the 9.4 to see if that can
be done.
I don't intend to upgrade both master and slaves on my current production
scenario just to be able to use DMS
Patrick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melvin Davidson | 2016-09-06 23:34:29 | Re: Postgres UPGRADE from 9.2 to 9.4 |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-09-06 23:25:13 | Re: Postgres UPGRADE from 9.2 to 9.4 |