| From: | Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Wal files - Question | Postgres 9.2 |
| Date: | 2016-12-01 02:47:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAJNY3iv-RYkrkNgSgmKNai6Atg5M-B+eFH8toG8LjE3H5DEH1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2016-12-01 14:15 GMT+13:00 David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-
>> replication.html
>>
>> wal_keep_segments is the parameter responsible for streaming replication
>> be able to recover itself without using wal_files, is that right?
>>
>
> [...] without using wal_files[sic] [from an external archive location]
>
> David J.
>
>
>
Yep David! Thanks for correcting me.
Got it now. Thanks everyone.
one more question... I'm working with wal_keep_segments = 1000 - Would
that in your opinion be a safe number?
Yes. I got plenty of free space and I'm using pg_xlogs in a different
partition on the master.
Patrick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2016-12-01 03:16:13 | Re: Logging for 2 instances of PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-12-01 01:15:53 | Re: Wal files - Question | Postgres 9.2 |