From: | Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: effective_io_concurrency increasing |
Date: | 2017-06-19 01:24:51 |
Message-ID: | CAJNY3itHy8NHasUjpov21Ba3rvna00CeT81HM7G=KU-ejNQ5sQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2017-06-19 13:19 GMT+12:00 Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> I just wanna understand the effective_io_concurrency value better.
>>
>> My current Master database server has 16 vCPUS and I
>> use effective_io_concurrency = 0.
>>
>> What can be the benefits of increasing that number? Also, do you guys
>> have any recommendations?
>>
>> I'm using PG 9.2 and the official doc does not say much about which value
>> you should use.
>>
>> If I put it to 1, does it mean I can have a query spread into 1 processor?
>>
>> Thanks
>> P
>>
>
>
>
> *Perhaps you should read the
> doc.https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-resource.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-resource.html>*
> 18.4.6. Asynchronous Behavior *effective_io_concurrency (integer)*
>
I've done that! But I'm looking for some personal experiences and
suggestions!!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melvin Davidson | 2017-06-19 01:41:31 | Re: effective_io_concurrency increasing |
Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2017-06-19 01:19:11 | Re: effective_io_concurrency increasing |