| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY and Volatile default expressions |
| Date: | 2013-04-15 20:32:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAJKUy5jYD+kwBA2oaA9WHdb5QFy3JSYFWkeZUv3cMG9qhWfgCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> OTOH, the notion that a UUID generator doesn't touch *any* database
> state seems like it might be worth treating as a general function
> property: it's simple to understand and applies to a lot of other
> volatile functions such as random() and clock_timestamp().
>
Something like the NO SQL access indication mandated by sql standard?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1267473390.7837.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-15 20:33:46 | Re: Query not using index for user defined type |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2013-04-15 20:27:07 | Re: Query not using index for user defined type |