Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-18 00:36:15
Message-ID: CAJKUy5jHON8wZU7aaoVtVCq4XLEK_8-AuGk74ah11EOxJsOB2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > And as I said - David showed interests and we sometimes talk about it too.
> > I never wanted to bother hackers with all this stuff.
>
> Actually, I would be very interested to see you post reports
> before/after each meeting either on -hackers or pgsql-sql.
>

Well Susanne said that the drafts are not public information so maybe
the things that *could* end up in a draft shouldn't be either, if so i
agree with the idea of creating a private list for that

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-09-18 00:51:58 Re: Double sorting split patch
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-09-17 22:57:34 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?