From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
Date: | 2011-09-18 00:36:15 |
Message-ID: | CAJKUy5jHON8wZU7aaoVtVCq4XLEK_8-AuGk74ah11EOxJsOB2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > And as I said - David showed interests and we sometimes talk about it too.
> > I never wanted to bother hackers with all this stuff.
>
> Actually, I would be very interested to see you post reports
> before/after each meeting either on -hackers or pgsql-sql.
>
Well Susanne said that the drafts are not public information so maybe
the things that *could* end up in a draft shouldn't be either, if so i
agree with the idea of creating a private list for that
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-09-18 00:51:58 | Re: Double sorting split patch |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-09-17 22:57:34 | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |