From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crash in BRIN minmax-multi indexes |
Date: | 2021-03-31 23:19:47 |
Message-ID: | CAJKUy5iAN81-O8uyGpHw=XAR-n7bGJ+D-XbgtjPDnf+MEsO5UA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:25 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I found the issue - it's kinda obvious, really. We need to
> consider the timezone, because the "time" parts alone may be sorted
> differently. The attached patch should fix this, and it also fixes a
> similar issue in the inet data type.
>
ah! yeah! obvious... if you say so ;)
> As for why the regression tests did not catch this, it's most likely
> because the data is likely generated in "nice" ordering, or something
> like that. I'll see if I can tweak the ordering to trigger these issues
> reliably, and I'll do a bit more randomized testing.
>
> There's also the question of rounding errors, which I think might cause
> random assert failures (but in practice it's harmless, in the worst case
> we'll merge the ranges a bit differently).
>
>
I can confirm this fixes the crash in the query I showed and the original case.
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org' | 2021-03-31 23:20:55 | Re: libpq debug log |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-03-31 23:10:36 | Re: Crash in BRIN minmax-multi indexes |