| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: is pg_log_standby_snapshot() really needed? |
| Date: | 2023-06-08 05:27:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAJKUy5hTQd4ZeRFr5ruNtXgJsfS+_8KtJLJKPSwhPKrw6PwpfQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:12 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> a no-activity system at the time the logical replication slot is being created.
> Means at the time the system is "non active" it may be possible that the checkpoint
> would still have a lot to do.
>
ok, this doesn't deserve that much attention anyway...
It doesn't seem to do any harm, so I'm not spending more time on it
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-06-08 05:33:57 | Re: Use COPY for populating all pgbench tables |
| Previous Message | YANG Xudong | 2023-06-08 05:24:02 | [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation. |