Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Date: 2014-03-12 03:50:28
Message-ID: CAJKUy5hC4qQyLVaBBGhQtvN_L=jE8=yk=g7w=f3BzBbVEgLejQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> But not sure how to define a unique
> index that allows (joe, db1) to coexist with (joe, db2) but not with
> (joe, 0).
>

and why you want that restriction? when you login you need to specify
the db, right? if you don't specify the db then is the global 'joe'
that want to login

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-03-12 03:52:47 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Previous Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-03-12 03:44:09 Re: COPY table FROM STDIN doesn't show count tag