Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
Date: 2012-08-31 00:48:08
Message-ID: CAJKUy5h74BddLLG6q6FZ3ZpmEdCE9g6cEoPfxtt-vWA7QGN+xA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure
>>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be
>>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is
>>> openjade, or really the original project.
>>
>> It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro
>> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to
>> use openjade.
>>
>
> so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or
> should we fail after not finding jade and report why?
>

the last one should read "openjade" ;)

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-08-31 01:14:23 Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2012-08-31 00:47:01 Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements