Re: pgAdmin 4 v2.0-rc1 builds

From: Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgAdmin 4 v2.0-rc1 builds
Date: 2017-09-14 15:06:09
Message-ID: CAJFwRrP87KccuA2k-1-fmkZN89L8TCccYDBm7PUPngi9WMLgwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Dave!

I have finished one Round of testing on this RC1 Build.

1400+ test cases executed during functional verification and track all test
cases through our local test suit.

New RM reported for *pgAdmin4* *2.0-RC1* Build:
----------------------------------------------------------------
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2691
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2692
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2693
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2695
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2698
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2699
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2700
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2705
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2707
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2708

------------------
*RM resolved in pgAdmin4 2.0 version:*
-----------------
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2555
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2551
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2631
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1165
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2043
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2594
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2616
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2620
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2617
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2590
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2557
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2452
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2633
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2541
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2644
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2634
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2657
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2655
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2654
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2606
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2659
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2567
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2646
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2656
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2544
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2582
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1697
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2447
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2168
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1918
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2539
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2537
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2584
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2560
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2556
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2596
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2668
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2662
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2597
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2559
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2562
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2593
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2670
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2619
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2684
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2324
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2501
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2178
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1812
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2680
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2211
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2474
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2456
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2135
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2664
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2558
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1955
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2003
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1948
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2681
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2579
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2637
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2074
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2170
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2153
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1988
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2080
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2586
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2563
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2334
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2689

Following RM will be fixed in next community Build:
-----
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2698
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2693
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2692
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2660

Only 1 RM remains from QA perspective for 2.0 version and will test in next
available community build:
------------------
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/2566

Kind Regards,

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Initial builds of 2.0-rc1 are at https://developer.pgadmin.o
> rg/~dpage/2.0-rc1/ for sanity testing and building of additional packages.
>
> Please let me know if any show-stoppers are found.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

--
Fahar Abbas
QMG
EnterpriseDB Corporation
Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803 <%28051%29%208466803>
Mobile: +92-333-5409707 <0333%205409707>
Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
Website: www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harshal Dhumal 2017-09-14 16:18:28 Re: Array representation and save array data from datagrid [RM2671][pgAdmin4]
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2017-09-14 14:19:53 Re: pgAdmin 4 commit: Bundle fonts with pgAdmin so we have a standard set f