Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys

From: Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hamid Quddus Akhtar <hamid(dot)quddus(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys
Date: 2016-10-19 11:42:16
Message-ID: CAJFwRrNpqgwdpfNO5JskG3zoaJzPs2_FJUbLLqRVda4k6N9w_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fahar,
>>
>> Please log the case on redmine.
>>
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1871
>
>> Please find the attached patch, please apply it locally, and test it.
>>
>> And, please update the case, and this mail chain accordingly.
>>
> This is resolved now and no error message displayed when we apply the
patch that is already shared.

>
>> Sure Will test the patch and update the status accordingly.
>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Ashesh Vashi
>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>
>>
>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Fahar Abbas <
>> fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the output of if we copy config_local.py and execute python
>>> setup.py
>>> pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
>>> ======================================
>>>
>>>
>>> The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does
>>> not exist.
>>> Entering initial setup mode...
>>> NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.
>>>
>>>
>>> Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
>>> user account:
>>>
>>> Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
>>> Password:
>>> Retype password:
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
>>> do_setup(app)
>>> File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
>>> password = encrypt_password(p1)
>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>> line 150, in encrypt_password
>>> signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>> line 108, in get_hmac
>>> 'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
>>> RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not
>>> be None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"
>>> python setup.py
>>> pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
>>> ======================================
>>>
>>> User can not do any setup for web based now.
>>>
>>>
>>> The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does
>>> not exist.
>>> Entering initial setup mode...
>>> NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.
>>>
>>>
>>> Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
>>> user account:
>>>
>>> Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
>>> Password:
>>> Retype password:
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
>>> do_setup(app)
>>> File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
>>> password = encrypt_password(p1)
>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>> line 150, in encrypt_password
>>> signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>> line 108, in get_hmac
>>> 'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
>>> RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not
>>> be None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Fahar Abbas <
>>> fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Testing Environment
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu 16.04 Linux 64:
>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> pg-AdminIV Development Environment Setup for Ubuntu :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1) Install GIT
>>>>
>>>> sudo apt-get install git
>>>>
>>>> 2) Install pip3
>>>>
>>>> sudo apt-get install python3-pip
>>>>
>>>> 3) Install virtualenv
>>>>
>>>> sudo pip3 install virtualenv
>>>>
>>>> 4) install below dependency as it is required for psycopg2 & pycrypto
>>>> module
>>>>
>>>> sudo apt-get install libpq-dev
>>>>
>>>> sudo apt-get install python3-dev
>>>>
>>>> 5) Create virtual environment
>>>>
>>>> virtualenv -p python3 venv
>>>>
>>>> 6) Create mkdir Projects
>>>>
>>>> 7) Clone git repo in Projects
>>>>
>>>> git clone http://git.postgresql.org/git/pgadmin4.git
>>>>
>>>> 8) activate virtual environment
>>>>
>>>> source venv/bin/activate
>>>>
>>>> 9) Install modules
>>>>
>>>> pip3 install -r requirements_py3.txt
>>>>
>>>> *10) Edit the config.py file to config_local.py resides in
>>>> Projects\pgAdmin4\web *
>>>>
>>>> 11)Now run setup.py file (\Projects\pgAdmin4\web)
>>>> python setup.py
>>>>
>>>> If user does not create config_local.py and do Python setup.py for new
>>>> Development then SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT message is also displayed:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the output:
>>>> -------------------------
>>>>
>>>> python setup.py
>>>> pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
>>>> ======================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does
>>>> not exist.
>>>> Entering initial setup mode...
>>>> NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
>>>> user account:
>>>>
>>>> Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
>>>> Password:
>>>> Retype password:
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
>>>> do_setup(app)
>>>> File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
>>>> password = encrypt_password(p1)
>>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>>> line 150, in encrypt_password
>>>> signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
>>>> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
>>>> line 108, in get_hmac
>>>> 'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
>>>> RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not
>>>> be None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"
>>>> (venv) fahar(at)fahar-virtual-machine:~/Projects/pgadmin4/web$
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this expected?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Fahar Abbas <
>>>> fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sure,
>>>>>
>>>>> Will test this thoroughly after complete investigation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Patch applied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fahar, can you please test this thoroughly in desktop and server
>>>>>> modes, with both fresh and upgraded installations?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1849
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Packagers: This change means that packages are no longer forced to
>>>>>> create a config_local.py file, and there is no longer any need to
>>>>>> explicitly set SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, SECURITY_KEY
>>>>>> and CSRF_SESSION_KEY in the config (in fact, they should be removed for new
>>>>>> installations, if you have included them in 1.0)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review the attached patch, and apply if you're
>>>>>>>>>>> happy with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Overall the patch looked good to me.
>>>>>>>>>> But - I encounter an issue in 'web' mode, which wont happen with
>>>>>>>>>> 'runtime'.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Steps for reproduction on existing pgAdmin 4 environment with
>>>>>>>>>> 'web' mode.
>>>>>>>>>> - Apply the patch
>>>>>>>>>> - Start the pgAdmin4 application (stand alone application).
>>>>>>>>>> - Open pgAdmin home page.
>>>>>>>>>> - Log out (if already login).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And, you will see an exception.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have figure out the issue with the patch.
>>>>>>>>>> We were setting the SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, after initializing
>>>>>>>>>> the Security object.
>>>>>>>>>> Hence - it could not set the SECURITY_KEY, and
>>>>>>>>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT properly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I had moved the Security object initialization after fetching
>>>>>>>>>> these configurations from the database.
>>>>>>>>>> I have attached a addon patch for the same.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now - I run into another issue.
>>>>>>>>>> Because - the existing password was hashed using the old
>>>>>>>>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, I am no more able to login to pgAdmin 4.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think - we need to think about different strategy for upgrading
>>>>>>>>>> the configuration file in the 'web' mode.
>>>>>>>>>> I was thinking - we can store the existing security
>>>>>>>>>> configurations in the database during upgrade process in 'web' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My concern with that is that we'll likely be storing the default
>>>>>>>>> config values in many cases, thus for those users, perpetuating the problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess what we need to do is re-encrypt the password during the
>>>>>>>>> upgrade - however, that makes me think; we then have both the key and the
>>>>>>>>> encrypted passwords in the same database which is clearly not a good idea.
>>>>>>>>> Sigh... Needs more thought.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, so I've been thinking about this and experimenting for a couple
>>>>>>>> of hours, as well as annoying the crap out of Magnus by thinking out loud
>>>>>>>> in his general direction, and it looks like this isn't a major problem as
>>>>>>>> from what I can see, SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT is (aside from really being a
>>>>>>>> key not a salt) not the only salting that's done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks like it's used system-wide as the key to generate an HMAC
>>>>>>>> of the users password, which is then passed to passlib which salts and
>>>>>>>> hashes it. I did some testing, and found that two users with the same
>>>>>>>> password end up with different hashes in the database, so clearly there is
>>>>>>>> also per-user salting happening. I also created two users, then dropped the
>>>>>>>> database and created the same user accounts with the same passwords again,
>>>>>>>> and found that the resulting hashes were different in both databases - thus
>>>>>>>> there is something else ensuring the hashes are unique across different
>>>>>>>> installations/databases.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, I believe we can do as you suggest and migrate existing values
>>>>>>>> for SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, given that there's clearly some other per user
>>>>>>>> and per installation/database salting going on anyway. New installations
>>>>>>>> can have the random value for SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We do not need to generate the random SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT during
>>>>>>> upgrade mode, which was wrong added in my addon patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please find the updated patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Otherwise - looks good to me.
>>>>>>> Please commit the new patch (if you're ok with the change).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't believe SECURITY_KEY and CSRF_SESSION_KEY are issues
>>>>>>>> either, as they're used for purposes that are essentially ephemeral, and
>>>>>>>> thus can be changed during an upgrade.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adding Magnus as I'd appreciate any thoughts he may have.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patch attached - please review (Ashesh, but others too would be
>>>>>>>> appreciated)!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Syed Fahar Abbas
>>>>> Quality Management Group
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
>>>>> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
>>>>> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
>>>>> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
>>>>> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Syed Fahar Abbas
>>>> Quality Management Group
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
>>>> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
>>>> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
>>>> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
>>>> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Syed Fahar Abbas
>>> Quality Management Group
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
>>> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
>>> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
>>> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
>>> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Syed Fahar Abbas
> Quality Management Group
>
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>

--
Syed Fahar Abbas
Quality Management Group

EnterpriseDB Corporation
Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
Mobile: +92-333-5409707
Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
Website: www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2016-10-19 12:05:45 Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys
Previous Message Sandeep Thakkar 2016-10-19 11:05:46 Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys