Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys

From: Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hamid Quddus Akhtar <hamid(dot)quddus(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: RM1849: Auto-generating security keys
Date: 2016-10-19 10:17:47
Message-ID: CAJFwRrNb5uR=8wQfi2MH_Zmvv6X02bQae+zNwe+OeKjHnGSswQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Here is the output of if we copy config_local.py and execute python setup.py
pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
======================================

The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does not
exist.
Entering initial setup mode...
NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.

Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
user account:

Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Password:
Retype password:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
do_setup(app)
File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
password = encrypt_password(p1)
File
"/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
line 150, in encrypt_password
signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
File
"/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
line 108, in get_hmac
'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not be
None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"
python setup.py
pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
======================================

User can not do any setup for web based now.

The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does not
exist.
Entering initial setup mode...
NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.

Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
user account:

Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Password:
Retype password:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
do_setup(app)
File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
password = encrypt_password(p1)
File
"/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
line 150, in encrypt_password
signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
File
"/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
line 108, in get_hmac
'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not be
None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> Dave,
>
> Testing Environment
>
> Ubuntu 16.04 Linux 64:
> --------------------------------
>
> pg-AdminIV Development Environment Setup for Ubuntu :
>
>
> 1) Install GIT
>
> sudo apt-get install git
>
> 2) Install pip3
>
> sudo apt-get install python3-pip
>
> 3) Install virtualenv
>
> sudo pip3 install virtualenv
>
> 4) install below dependency as it is required for psycopg2 & pycrypto
> module
>
> sudo apt-get install libpq-dev
>
> sudo apt-get install python3-dev
>
> 5) Create virtual environment
>
> virtualenv -p python3 venv
>
> 6) Create mkdir Projects
>
> 7) Clone git repo in Projects
>
> git clone http://git.postgresql.org/git/pgadmin4.git
>
> 8) activate virtual environment
>
> source venv/bin/activate
>
> 9) Install modules
>
> pip3 install -r requirements_py3.txt
>
> *10) Edit the config.py file to config_local.py resides in
> Projects\pgAdmin4\web *
>
> 11)Now run setup.py file (\Projects\pgAdmin4\web)
> python setup.py
>
> If user does not create config_local.py and do Python setup.py for new
> Development then SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT message is also displayed:
>
> Here is the output:
> -------------------------
>
> python setup.py
> pgAdmin 4 - Application Initialisation
> ======================================
>
>
> The configuration database - '/home/fahar/.pgadmin/pgadmin4.db' does not
> exist.
> Entering initial setup mode...
> NOTE: Configuring authentication for SERVER mode.
>
>
> Enter the email address and password to use for the initial pgAdmin
> user account:
>
> Email address: fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> Password:
> Retype password:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "setup.py", line 449, in <module>
> do_setup(app)
> File "setup.py", line 96, in do_setup
> password = encrypt_password(p1)
> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
> line 150, in encrypt_password
> signed = get_hmac(password).decode('ascii')
> File "/home/fahar/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flask_security/utils.py",
> line 108, in get_hmac
> 'set to "%s"' % _security.password_hash)
> RuntimeError: The configuration value `SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT` must not be
> None when the value of `SECURITY_PASSWORD_HASH` is set to "pbkdf2_sha512"
> (venv) fahar(at)fahar-virtual-machine:~/Projects/pgadmin4/web$
>
>
> Is this expected?
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Fahar Abbas <fahar(dot)abbas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> > wrote:
>
>> Sure,
>>
>> Will test this thoroughly after complete investigation.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Patch applied.
>>>
>>> Fahar, can you please test this thoroughly in desktop and server modes,
>>> with both fresh and upgraded installations?
>>>
>>> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1849
>>>
>>> Packagers: This change means that packages are no longer forced to
>>> create a config_local.py file, and there is no longer any need to
>>> explicitly set SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, SECURITY_KEY
>>> and CSRF_SESSION_KEY in the config (in fact, they should be removed for new
>>> installations, if you have included them in 1.0)
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you please review the attached patch, and apply if you're happy
>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Overall the patch looked good to me.
>>>>>>> But - I encounter an issue in 'web' mode, which wont happen with
>>>>>>> 'runtime'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steps for reproduction on existing pgAdmin 4 environment with 'web'
>>>>>>> mode.
>>>>>>> - Apply the patch
>>>>>>> - Start the pgAdmin4 application (stand alone application).
>>>>>>> - Open pgAdmin home page.
>>>>>>> - Log out (if already login).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And, you will see an exception.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have figure out the issue with the patch.
>>>>>>> We were setting the SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, after initializing the
>>>>>>> Security object.
>>>>>>> Hence - it could not set the SECURITY_KEY, and
>>>>>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had moved the Security object initialization after fetching these
>>>>>>> configurations from the database.
>>>>>>> I have attached a addon patch for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now - I run into another issue.
>>>>>>> Because - the existing password was hashed using the old
>>>>>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, I am no more able to login to pgAdmin 4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think - we need to think about different strategy for upgrading
>>>>>>> the configuration file in the 'web' mode.
>>>>>>> I was thinking - we can store the existing security configurations
>>>>>>> in the database during upgrade process in 'web' mode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My concern with that is that we'll likely be storing the default
>>>>>> config values in many cases, thus for those users, perpetuating the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess what we need to do is re-encrypt the password during the
>>>>>> upgrade - however, that makes me think; we then have both the key and the
>>>>>> encrypted passwords in the same database which is clearly not a good idea.
>>>>>> Sigh... Needs more thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, so I've been thinking about this and experimenting for a couple of
>>>>> hours, as well as annoying the crap out of Magnus by thinking out loud in
>>>>> his general direction, and it looks like this isn't a major problem as from
>>>>> what I can see, SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT is (aside from really being a key
>>>>> not a salt) not the only salting that's done.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like it's used system-wide as the key to generate an HMAC of
>>>>> the users password, which is then passed to passlib which salts and hashes
>>>>> it. I did some testing, and found that two users with the same password end
>>>>> up with different hashes in the database, so clearly there is also per-user
>>>>> salting happening. I also created two users, then dropped the database and
>>>>> created the same user accounts with the same passwords again, and found
>>>>> that the resulting hashes were different in both databases - thus there is
>>>>> something else ensuring the hashes are unique across different
>>>>> installations/databases.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I believe we can do as you suggest and migrate existing values for
>>>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, given that there's clearly some other per user and
>>>>> per installation/database salting going on anyway. New installations can
>>>>> have the random value for SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT.
>>>>>
>>>> We do not need to generate the random SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT during
>>>> upgrade mode, which was wrong added in my addon patch.
>>>>
>>>> Please find the updated patch.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise - looks good to me.
>>>> Please commit the new patch (if you're ok with the change).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe SECURITY_KEY and CSRF_SESSION_KEY are issues either,
>>>>> as they're used for purposes that are essentially ephemeral, and thus can
>>>>> be changed during an upgrade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding Magnus as I'd appreciate any thoughts he may have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch attached - please review (Ashesh, but others too would be
>>>>> appreciated)!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Syed Fahar Abbas
>> Quality Management Group
>>
>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
>> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
>> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
>> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
>> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Syed Fahar Abbas
> Quality Management Group
>
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
> Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
> Mobile: +92-333-5409707
> Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
> Website: www.enterprisedb.com
>

--
Syed Fahar Abbas
Quality Management Group

EnterpriseDB Corporation
Phone Office: +92-51-835-8874
Phone Direct: +92-51-8466803
Mobile: +92-333-5409707
Skype ID: syed.fahar.abbas
Website: www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashesh Vashi 2016-10-19 10:48:41 pgAdmin 4 commit: Resolved - Integer type of preferences are not update
Previous Message Dave Page 2016-10-19 10:06:14 Re: Setting up pgAdmin4 as a web application