Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions

From: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
Date: 2025-03-19 03:12:20
Message-ID: CAJDiXgjxNK=kaVGUfp07y1VYCy6OLU-V_6AKRcfaABGKNHee+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:32 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm probably done trying to help with this one - it's beyond my ability and desire to contribute to meaningfully. It seems to need to be escalated if the regression has a chance of being understood and fixed.
> Some good candidates for helping out are copied already so I'm just hoping one or more of them chimes in. I'll repeat my suggestion to start a new thread and let this one die. The answer to $subject is no.

Well, the name of the thread has stopped reflecting what is being
discussed here. I may start a new discussion in the near future, but
as part of this discussion I would like to make sure that people agree
with the statements from my previous letter.

Thanks for your help.

--
Best regards,
Daniil Davydov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-03-19 03:13:37 Re: Proposal: Deferred Replica Filtering for PostgreSQL Logical Replication
Previous Message Sutou Kouhei 2025-03-19 02:56:17 Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations