From: | Rémy-Christophe Schermesser <rcs(at)netcosports(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bertrand Paquet <bertrand(at)netcosports(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Performance problem on 2 PG versions on same query |
Date: | 2014-11-06 12:56:45 |
Message-ID: | CAJDhA5wcDAEC+z_HKYv4Pn-H=SLLsxLnHEvCrAGHF1RE_snHog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you very much for the insights (and how to read correctly a explain
:)).
There is a difference in data between the 2 databases, crons where running
on one and not the other.
But your insights enabled us to dive deeper, thanks !
2014-11-05 18:30 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> > Dne 5 Listopad 2014, 18:10, Tom Lane napsal(a):
> >> For some reason there's over 1000 times more rows in andalertsmatch in
> >> the 9.1.14 installation. I'm betting on a foulup somewhere in the data
> >> dump/restore process.
>
> > I'd bet that's mostly due to rescans in the merge join ...
>
> Doh, I should have thought of that :-(. But still, the difference in
> the number of final output rows is pretty compelling evidence that
> it's not really the same data.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2014-11-06 14:09:20 | Re: DATA corruption after promoting slave to master |
Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2014-11-06 12:40:14 | Re: Incomplete startup packet help needed |