Re: BDR

From: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BDR
Date: 2016-06-13 12:13:09
Message-ID: CAJBB=EXMZTCNxPuaCcoPZLuRoHXTiH0utgpY93ChGD8=3FfggQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

http://bdr-project.org/docs/next/logical-vs-physical.html

"It (BDR) has significant advantages - and some disadvantages - when
compared to PostgreSQL's older physical (block-based) streaming or
archive-based replication with warm or hot standby"

What exactly is block based? Changes are recorded in the redo log,
right? Does that mean that in streaming replication, from redo log the
server applies changes at the block level of the data-file. That would
also mean that at any time, both primary and standby would be exactly
same, block by block.

In response to

  • Re: BDR at 2016-06-12 14:14:19 from Craig Ringer

Responses

  • Re: BDR at 2016-06-13 12:48:30 from Alvaro Aguayo Garcia-Rada

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Aguayo Garcia-Rada 2016-06-13 12:48:30 Re: BDR
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-06-13 12:10:16 Re: table name size