From: | Lenz Grimmer <lenz(at)grimmer(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding Oracle Linux to the Linux Download pages |
Date: | 2013-12-23 10:23:14 |
Message-ID: | CAJAd_WEEa7mtzUcbMhbp3b=D3ZY-CHNPkJ85W6EdOkWTnW8xxQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't believe it is. I see no problem in adding information about the
> Oracle linux distribution, just like we have information about Oracle
> Solaris. This is about providing a service to our users, after all.
Thank you, I appreciate your support. We have users that contacted us because
they want to run newer versions of PostgreSQL on OL. That's why I reached out to
this list.
> Now if Devrim doesn't want to spend time verifying the packages for Oracle
> Linux, that's of course his decision.
Absolutely.
> But we can certainly list what the distribution default is. But we could then specifically list under the
> section of "PostgreSQL Yum Repository" which distributions are supported there.
Yes, I think it's fine to make that distinction. The top part of
http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
first explains what versions of PG are included by default in which
versions of RHEL and its derivatives.
It then points to the yum repo, but without making a clear indication
which distributions have been tested
explicitly (and are thus considered "supported"?). If you go to
http://yum.postgresql.org/, it talks about
"available platforms", listing RHEL, CentOS and SL (among other
RPM-based distros).
> (Though in the end I think it would be beneficial to the users if we could
> support Oracle Linux as well, its always a matter of resources vs number of
> users. There are a lot of debian based distributions that aren't officially
> supported by our apt repository either, for example)
Right.
> In fact, we should probably list that there regardless - so people know
> which versions are actually supported by that repository. Should we perhaps
> even specifically list which versions of each distro?
For the RHEL-based distributions, I think it's sufficient to just
state the major version (e.g.
RHEL 6, CentOS 6, etc.) - the minor version (e.g. "6.5") just
indicates an update release, which is
primarily a consolidation of all updates/errate that have accumulated.
Each update release within
a major release is fully binary compatible (the ABI remains
unchanged). A version of PostgreSQL
build on RHEL 6.0 will still run on 6.5.
Lenz
--
Lenz Grimmer <lenz(at)grimmer(dot)com> - http://www.lenzg.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lenz Grimmer | 2013-12-23 13:15:37 | Re: Adding Oracle Linux to the Linux Download pages |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2013-12-22 14:30:09 | Re: Adding Oracle Linux to the Linux Download pages |