Re: Git is not an acronym

From: "Douglas A(dot) Whitfield" <douglasawh(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: daniel(at)yesql(dot)se
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git is not an acronym
Date: 2021-06-10 19:49:18
Message-ID: CAJ9PG8Uh8WM2XumV5HAo_NaHsKU0SbHjRyjX1-JdVf9WLTkjyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 08:34, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Not harmful, but an acronym which we explain with the acronym itself doesn't
> seem like helpful use of page real-estate.
>

Perhaps I am missing something. The two acronyms offered appear to be:

"global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually
works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
"goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks

I don't personally care all that much whether it stays or goes at
present, but again, perhaps I am missing something.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Bower 2021-06-11 19:16:29 Re: SQL Commands COPY
Previous Message Marc Millas 2021-06-10 14:05:54 Re: Git is not an acronym