From: | "Douglas A(dot) Whitfield" <douglasawh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | daniel(at)yesql(dot)se |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Git is not an acronym |
Date: | 2021-06-10 19:49:18 |
Message-ID: | CAJ9PG8Uh8WM2XumV5HAo_NaHsKU0SbHjRyjX1-JdVf9WLTkjyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 08:34, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Not harmful, but an acronym which we explain with the acronym itself doesn't
> seem like helpful use of page real-estate.
>
Perhaps I am missing something. The two acronyms offered appear to be:
"global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually
works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
"goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
I don't personally care all that much whether it stays or goes at
present, but again, perhaps I am missing something.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Bower | 2021-06-11 19:16:29 | Re: SQL Commands COPY |
Previous Message | Marc Millas | 2021-06-10 14:05:54 | Re: Git is not an acronym |