Re: [PATCH] Handle SK_SEARCHNULL and SK_SEARCHNOTNULL in HeapKeyTest

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Sven Klemm <sven(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle SK_SEARCHNULL and SK_SEARCHNOTNULL in HeapKeyTest
Date: 2024-07-02 08:15:22
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TPfKpVfYDBOYkjhNFn0JMtjx9KfL=JPRO5VUy=BXaVW7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> > As I recall, previously it was argued that changes like this should
> > have some use within the core [1].
>
> I don't see that argument anywhere in the thread honestly. I did see
> heiki asking why it would be useful for extensions, but that was
> answered there.

The referred patch was rejected at first because it didn't modify
nodeSeqScan.c to make use of the change within the core.

I'm not saying this is necessarily applicable to this particular patch
or that this is a general rule though.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2024-07-02 08:22:15 Re: Optimize numeric multiplication for one and two base-NBASE digit multiplicands.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-07-02 08:14:23 Re: Underscore in positional parameters?