Re: rand48 replacement

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: rand48 replacement
Date: 2021-09-24 12:50:00
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TOjfmtyBFZUzGLTSvSGydxUTjY67kn-FFrSUBgEpy7zrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Fabien,

> Attached a v10 which is some kind of compromise where the interface uses
> inclusive min and max bounds, so that all values can be reached.

Just wanted to let you know that cfbot [1] doesn't seem to be happy with
the patch. Apparently, some tests are falling. To be honest, I didn't
invest too much time into investigating this. Hopefully, it's not a big
deal.

[1]: http://cfbot.cputube.org/

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2021-09-24 12:57:44 Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-09-24 12:42:33 Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option