From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Sven Klemm <sven(at)timescale(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Check snapshot argument of index_beginscan and family |
Date: | 2022-11-28 10:29:55 |
Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TOf=2h64U=knCS8_VrR8iFkZ=+=xH1F5CEJdXqCsQNtgQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the feedback!
> I think it's a nice catch and worth fixing. The one thing I don't
> agree with is using asserts for handling the error that can appear
> because most probably the server is built with assertions off and in
> this case, there still will be a crash in this case. I'd do this with
> report ERROR. Otherwise, the patch looks right and worth committing.
Normally a developer is not supposed to pass NULLs there so I figured
having extra if's in the release builds doesn't worth it. Personally I
wouldn't mind using ereport() but my intuition tells me that the
committers are not going to approve this :)
Let's see what the rest of the community thinks.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-11-28 10:38:18 | Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2022-11-28 10:29:41 | Re: Another multi-row VALUES bug |