| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
| Date: | 2021-10-14 12:21:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TOR+Tm5MXgwVE6i3=pHYN75humDghhnv_zK1A3F1TWNjQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Vik,
> I have not looked at the patch, but +1 for the feature.
Maybe you could describe your use case in a little more detail? How
did you end up working with PostGIS geometry via psql on regular
basis? What exactly do you find of annoyance? How will the proposed
patch help?
I find it great that we have people with polar opinions in the
discussion. But to reach any consensus you should make the opponent
understand your situation. Also, please don't simply discard the
disadvantages stated above. If you don't believe these are significant
disadvantages, please explain why do you think so.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-10-14 12:28:32 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-10-14 12:13:00 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |