| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
| Date: | 2021-10-15 12:24:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TNxyAoYo5+F+eXf95mNi4ZzBeGKLjCnfYJcCe7fk2Q-YQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Gilles,
> But we have more and more application coming from others RDBMS with sometime
> no real possibility to modify the code or which requires lot of work.
Somehow I feel everyone here very well understood the real motivation
behind this
proposal from the beginning, considering the e-mail of the author. And came to
his or her own conclusions.
> If we really want SELECT * to be reserved to DBA then why not removing the
> star from PG unless you have the admin privilege?
Respectfully, I perceive this as a trolling (presumably, non-intentional one)
and not going to answer this.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-15 13:08:27 | Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-15 12:05:09 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |