| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Date: | 2025-02-19 15:13:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TNwO-TPiRUMJPv3gtwyDwbVkwp5QpHJaQHD3Veq3Etr_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> > On Feb 19, 2025, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > The opposite, which was discussed at length at FOSDEM, was to ask authors to
> > click a single button once a month at most. If that level of engagement is too
> > much to ask then maybe said authors should question why they in return ask
> > others to spend hours reviewing?
>
> Exactly this.
True, but didn't we just discover that it doesn't work?
"""
There's a bunch that are still not moved, that I know should be moved. [...]
"""
I agree about the fact that "no interest" status might be a bit too
judgmental. There might be interest but no time. Perhaps something
like "no activity" or "closed due to inactivity" would be more
appropriate / neutral. We should also emphasise in the emails that the
author is free to reopen the entry if he/she believes it was closed by
mistake.
I also agree that we should account for feature freezes.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-19 15:19:44 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-02-19 15:05:45 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |