| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Date: | 2025-02-19 14:29:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TNuctF4WR3=_Do3d9k8esKNap6m193YE1oEWJb3ADZjtQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> I think this sounds much more reasonable than what's happening now.
> But I think we need to make the flow a bit more clear:
> 1. Add a "no interest" reason for closing.
> 2. Add a label[2]/column that specifies that an entry will be closed
> as "no interest" automatically at the end of this CF, e.g. a "pending
> no interest" label.
> 3. If at the end of a commitfest a patch has had 3 or more months
> without any emails, it automatically gets that "pending no interest"
> label.
> 4. Anyone subscribed to emails for this patch will get notified about
> that change.
> 5. If a patch is Ready for Committer and has a committer assigned,
> never add this label.
> 6. At the end of the commitfest, move all patches without that label.
> And close all patches with such a label.
Sounds perfect to me.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-02-19 15:02:34 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2025-02-19 14:24:58 | Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements |