| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove unused fields in ReorderBufferTupleBuf |
| Date: | 2024-01-22 10:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TN3QD0gNsH=a7E9=vKHUbJ84Tp0n9=Rd8QuUvC2KuBjWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> Hi, this patch was marked in CF as "Needs Review" [1], but there has
> been no activity on this thread for 5+ months.
>
> Do you wish to keep this open, or can you post something to elicit
> more interest in reviews for the latest patch set? Otherwise, if
> nothing happens then the CF entry will be closed ("Returned with
> feedback") at the end of this CF.
I don't think that closing CF entries only due to inactivity is a good
practice, nor something we typically do. When someone will have spare
time this person will (hopefully) review the code.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2024-01-22 11:00:45 | Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2024-01-22 10:43:45 | Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority |