Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
Date: 2022-07-18 08:12:10
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TMhOvYpFpP52CfR0cjt2U9Y7PmGBtT2ormvZd1ULQZRNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi again,

> Just a quick question - is there a reason for changing the subject of
> the emails?
>
> Not all email clients handle this well, e.g. Google Mail considers
> this being 10 separate threads. The CF application and/or
> pgsql-hackers@ archive also don't recognise this as a continuation of
> the original thread. So all the discussions in -v8, -v9, -v9 ets
> threads get lost.
>
> May I suggest using a single thread?

OK, the part about the archive is wrong - I scrolled right to the end
of the thread, didn't notice v10 patch above and assumed it was lost.
Sorry for the confusion. However, the part about various email clients
is accurate.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-07-18 08:18:44 Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2022-07-18 08:05:23 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10