| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris BSomething <xpusostomos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistency of timezones in postgresql |
| Date: | 2024-07-31 13:23:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TME_YvU-zS0Jn1R6LECPvCamG4UToitZw7+0UJdDL+K0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
> "The function timezone(zone, timestamp) is equivalent to the SQL-conforming construct timestamp AT TIME ZONE zone."
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-ZONECONVERT
>
> Documentation seems to think it is.
I don't see any mention of the standard. As I understand the
documentation merely says that timezone() corresponds to the AT TIME
ZONE SQL-syntax. Whether the syntax is standard or not is not clear.
Maybe it *is* in the standard but I don't have the right volume and/or
my copy is outdated (it's 2016). Closest thing I could find is section
"4.6.2 Datetimes" of the document "ISO-IEC 9075-2 Foundation" (~1700
pages). I couldn't find any mention of AT TIME ZONE (or timezone()
function) in this or any other documents I have.
In any case the question if AT TIME ZONE is a standard syntax or not
doesn't seem to be particularly relevant in the context of this bug
report.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2024-07-31 13:24:29 | Re: BUG #18556: Parallel operation error during CREATE TABLE AS statement |
| Previous Message | Junwang Zhao | 2024-07-31 13:17:38 | Re: BUG #18560: Inconsistent Behavior of PostgreSQL 'LIKE' Operator |