Re: PostgreSQL and local HDD

From: Olivier Gautherot <ogautherot(at)gautherot(dot)net>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and local HDD
Date: 2023-08-16 04:48:17
Message-ID: CAJ7S9TVBx+QSoa3GU_7D4LtiEXOX8JkhBje2wbv8QgjodYevZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

El mié, 16 ago 2023 5:39, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:

> On 8/15/23 04:24, Olivier Gautherot wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?
>>
>
> Faster storage can only help but I would start by discarding functional
> overhead.
>
>
> Functional overhead?
>

I mean inefficient design, which won't be solved by changing the storage.

--
Olivier Gautherot

>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2023-08-16 04:54:35 Re: PostgreSQL and local HDD
Previous Message Ron 2023-08-16 03:40:40 Re: PostgreSQL and local HDD