| From: | John the Scott <jmscott(at)setspace(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Avinash Vallarapu <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI |
| Date: | 2024-08-22 22:02:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ4ch7rGGDNKFxhxNWuKpMDmBX1irUayEm5x2rPFyVVJgxvS6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Posts should be technically and factually correct
agreed and period. no need qualify how the nonsense was created.
-john
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:13 PM Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 8:33 AM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Vallarapu <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether it is written by AI or a human.
> >> AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out that a blog is written by AI (which I know is difficult to implement).
> >
> >
> > Right - I am not interested in "proving" things, but I think a policy to discourage overuse of AI is warranted.
> >
> >> People may also use AI generated Images in their blogs, and they may be meaningful for their article.
> >> Is it only the content or also the images ? It might get too complicated while implementing some rules.
> >
> >
> > Only the content, the images are perfectly fine. Even expected, these days.
> >
> >>
> >> Ultimately, Humans do make mistakes and we shouldn't discourage people assuming it is AI that made that mistake.
> >
> >
> > Humans make mistakes. AI confidently hallucinates.
> >
>
> I think this is a key point, and one that we could focus on for
> purposes of discouragement. Ie. "Blogs that are found to repeatedly
> post incorrect information and/or AI style hallucinations may be
> restricted from contributing to the planet postgres feed. This will be
> determined on a case by case basis." While it is likely impossible to
> come up with a set of rules that will satisfy some of the more
> legalistic folks among us, this would be a simple warning that would
> at least encourage folks to make sure they aren't posting bad
> information and leave a door open for enforcement if needed. And yes,
> this assumes that the folks running planet will enforce if needed,
> though I don't think it requires heavy policing at this point.
>
> Robert Treat
> https://xzilla.net
>
>
--
Fast is fine, But accuracy is final.
You must learn to be slow in a hurry.
- Wyatt Earp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Morris de Oryx | 2024-08-22 22:34:39 | Is there a way to translate pg_amop.amopstrategy into a description? |
| Previous Message | Vince McMahon | 2024-08-22 21:31:41 | Re: How to validate restore of backup? |