Re: rum index supported on pg13?

From: John the Scott <jmscott(at)setspace(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rum index supported on pg13?
Date: 2020-10-12 17:17:04
Message-ID: CAJ4ch7qaGo4hQrgYHH1u82vhE0y=Q7zG949A=1RcR5-LHDG_VQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

No, instead i posted the compile errors.

I am still new to github protocol, so i was not sure
if asking about longer term support of rum was appropriate for
the github issues posting.

the differences between pg12 and pg13 seem considerable.
our internal use of rum has been spectacularly successful,
we may be able to justify resources to fixing the compile issues with pg13,
but the effort will be considerable.

-john

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 7:16 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:29:31PM -0500, John the Scott wrote:
> > will rum index from postgrespro be supported in pg13?
> > numerous errors occur when compiling rum in pg13 and
> > no replies from github. the differences from pg12
> > to pg13 seem to be significant
> >
> > https://github.com/postgrespro/rum
>
> Did you ask directly this question to the authors of the extension on
> the page of the project you are quoting above?
> --
> Michael

--
Fast is fine, But accuracy is final.
You must learn to be slow in a hurry.
- Wyatt Earp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-10-13 00:22:08 Re: rum index supported on pg13?
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2020-10-12 17:03:52 Re: Column aliases in GROUP BY and HAVING