On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> wrote:
> > On the other hand, if the temp table can be completely ditched for a
> > session variable or two, then yeah, that would be much better since
> > you'd avoid the overhead of creating the table completely.
>
> Yes, this is what I was aiming at, based on the OP mentioning he only
> has a limited amount of data to manage in this way.
>
Yup, I'm going to see how this goes using session variables. I think it is
exactly what I need. Thanks!
--
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Senior Systems Engineer
2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com | www.neadwerx.com