Re: Can you spot the difference?

From: Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can you spot the difference?
Date: 2013-04-17 14:49:15
Message-ID: CAJ4CxLk5gvkVYT1c0xGn-Qh-QXNsDUZKXW8ZssOZsxuLfNUz8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> "
> The autovacuum daemon, if enabled, will automatically issue ANALYZE
> commands whenever the content of a table has changed sufficiently. However,
> administrators might prefer to rely on manually-scheduled ANALYZE
> operations, particularly if it is known that update activity on a table
> will not affect the statistics of "interesting" columns. The daemon
> schedules ANALYZE strictly as a function of the number of rows inserted or
> updated; it has no knowledge of whether that will lead to meaningful
> statistical changes.
> "
>
> So at a guess there has not been enough churn on the table.
>

So pg_restore's COPY would not trigger the ANALYZE? That seems wrong.

--
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Manager of Systems Engineering
2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com | www.neadwerx.com

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." -- Aristotle

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dale Fukami 2013-04-17 14:53:44 Re: Mysterious table that exists but doesn't exist
Previous Message Philipp Kraus 2013-04-17 14:44:17 Re: dataset lock