From: | Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What's faster? BEGIN ... EXCEPTION or CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS? |
Date: | 2012-10-03 19:14:08 |
Message-ID: | CAJ4CxL=wqaukmWULaRy68MY7LUgTnzp3b9jb0wMsWDshB9L-iw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Yes but that is irrelevant to the discussion. I am comparing the speed of
> > repeated table existence checks with the speed of repeated exception
> blocks
> > that access said table.
>
> Both approaches have to do a catalog scan (even if you've established
> an exception block the server still internally has to do a catalog
> scan in order to raise an appropriate error). The exception block has
> the additional overhead of a subtransaction.
>
OK this makes sense. Thanks :-) I will go for the CREATE TABLE approach.
--
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Senior Systems Engineer
2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com | www.neadwerx.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2012-10-03 19:41:03 | Re: syntax error collate |
Previous Message | Ben Chobot | 2012-10-03 18:55:06 | Re: surprising behavior or nothing to see here? |