| From: | Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to switch file systems with least downtime? |
| Date: | 2013-09-14 13:46:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ4CxL=h+=hre5pf1nyEWt06VV4RsgJwj73OiBTUzjBSe9FgRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Have you considered setting up a synchronously replicated slave database
> on the new file system (using a port other than 5432), getting it in sync,
> then shutting both databases down (master first), switching the slave over
> to become the master and restarting just that database on port 5432?
Not a bad idea, but in this case, a small amount of downtime is preferable
over going to that level of effort.
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Manager of Systems Engineering
2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com | www.neadwerx.com
"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." -- Aristotle
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CS DBA | 2013-09-14 15:26:31 | Re: How to switch file systems with least downtime? |
| Previous Message | Michael Nolan | 2013-09-14 13:40:42 | Re: How to switch file systems with least downtime? |